Israel’s greatest outrage in West Asia – marking the last stand of white supremacy – occurred 76 years ago, when European Jewish settlers drove around 800,000 people to the Nakba. It is ironic that it also appears to hold the promise of a solution. Palestinian Arabs were uprooted from the only homeland they had ever known. Whether that promise is realized depends on whether the United States heeds Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s cryptic warning that “this is not a time for war, but for dialogue and diplomacy.”
When Mr. Modi said that in June 2023, a gleeful Western media quickly concluded that he despised Russian President Vladimir Putin, who invaded Ukraine. Perhaps he was. But if so, with increasing harsh references to the impending World War III, here we are 10 months later, with this catchy comment having no effect on Russian militarism at all. It reminds me of that. But if the United States can get over its blindness about whether Israel is right or wrong and accept that Asian parties like Iran, Iraq, Syria, Hamas, and Hezbollah may join, then in West Asia “Dialogue and diplomacy” may prove effective. In “Evil Empire,” innocent Palestinians are victims of a brutal massacre by white people.
Israel’s colonization of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank poses a major threat to world peace and stability today. More than 34,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since October 7, when Hamas, patriotic in nature but clearly terrorist in its operations, attacked southern Israel, and 77,000 more have been killed in Gaza. was injured. The death toll from that terrible night has reached 1,139 people, and dozens of Israeli hostages are still held by Hamas in Gaza. None of this can be excused. But so far, when it comes to the big picture, it is abundantly clear that European Israel, if left alone, will never give freedom to Asian Palestinians. Nor is Israel willing to honor pious resolutions passed by the United Nations General Assembly.
Regarding the October 7 attack, the United Nations Special Envoy on Sexual Crimes in Conflict cited “clear and convincing” evidence that the hostages were raped while in custody in Gaza, as well as rape and gang violence during the onslaught. He submitted a 24-page report showing that a rape likely occurred. POWs continue to be subjected to such abuse. As expected, Israel accused the UN of downplaying Hamas’ atrocities and dragging its feet in investigating the allegations, a charge the UN Secretary-General quickly denied.
Hamas’ atrocities are unacceptable, but Hamas did not start the war. The events of October 7, while horrifying, were just another episode in his continuing horror story that began with the Nakba. In another brutal incident, on February 29, 2024, Israeli forces killed more than 100 Palestinians and injured more than 700 while distributing flour in Gaza City. After shooting the hungry refugees, Israel committed direct massacres by sending in tanks to crush the bodies of the dead and living.
Prior to this, the world witnessed the so-called ‘Naxas’. This signifies the defeat and setback suffered by the Palestinian people in 1967 when another 300,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed. As a result of this decisive Six-Day War (June 5-10, 1967, the third between Arabs and Israelis), Israel was forced to move from Egypt to the Sinai Peninsula and the Gaza Strip, to the West Bank of Jordan and the Old City of Jerusalem. , and occupied the Syrian Golan. Heights. Since then, the status of these territories has been a key issue in the Arab-Israeli conflict as well as a guide to possible territorial solutions.
The war, which added 1 million second-class Arabs to Israel’s population, began in November 1966 when Israeli forces attacked the West Bank village of al-Sam, killing 18 people and wounding 54 others. It started with In Syria in April 1967, Israeli forces shot down six Syrian MIG fighter planes. Soviet intelligence reports indicating that Israel was planning an operation against Syria proved inaccurate, but this information further heightened tensions between Israel and its Arab neighbors.
The silver lining is that the Six-Day War led to the United Nations’ unanimous Security Council Resolution 242 on November 22, 1967, starting a peace process that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu initially paid lip service to. Ta. There are also references to “unconditional negotiations,” Arab guarantees that Israel’s borders must be “secure,” and a peace treaty for all parties. Resolution 242 recognizes the “unacceptability of the acquisition of territory through war and the need to strive for a just and lasting peace in which all countries of the region can live in security.” It “affirms that the implementation of the principles of the United Nations Charter requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace”…which should include “the withdrawal of Israeli forces from areas occupied in recent conflicts” It is. “The cessation of all claims or hostilities and the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of all States in the region and the right to reside peacefully within secure and recognized boundaries, free from threats and acts of violence. Respect and recognition.”
If the rule of law rather than the law of the jungle prevails, these provisions deserve to be respected. Given the realities of great power politics, one might not expect the US president to declare, as China’s representative Ma Xinmin did at the International Court of Justice: The use of force to resist foreign oppression and to complete the establishment of an independent state is an inalienable right well-founded in international law. ” However, he argued, as the US State Department’s Deputy General Counsel Richard Visek did for the ICJ, that “the court should not find that Israel has a legal obligation to immediately and unconditionally withdraw from the occupied territory.” ” and bring dishonor upon themselves. .
Visek should consider India’s prompt, voluntary and complete withdrawal from Bangladesh immediately after its incomparably complete victory, as well as the free release of 93,000 Pakistani prisoners of war. . When it comes to comparisons with the Good Friday Agreement of April 10, 1998, which ended 30 years of conflict in Northern Ireland, the difference is that all Irish players were white.
Israel is not only a technology hub, one of the world’s largest arms exporters, and a recipient of billions of US dollars, but its white Jews will be the last stand of white supremacy. They are fighting Asians of color.
Source link
